nanog mailing list archives

Re: 20-30Gbps UDP 1720 traffic appearing to originate from CN in last 24 hours


From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck Nether net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:43:08 -0400

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 08:09:56AM -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote:

DNS is still largely UDP.

        Water is also still wet :) - but you may not be doing 10% of your
links as UDP/53.

        DNS can also use TCP as well, including sending more than one
query in a pipelined fashion.

        The challenge that Cameron is trying to document here
is when seeing large volumes of UDP it becomes necessary to do
something to keep the network up.  This response is frustrating for those
of us who prefer to have a unfiltered e2e network but maintaining 
the network as up in the face of these adverse conditions is important.

        - Jared


--Curtis

On 7/20/2015 5:40 PM, Ca By wrote:
Folks, it may be time to  take the next step and admit that UDP is too
broken to support

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-byrne-opsec-udp-advisory-00

Your comments have been requested



On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Drew Weaver <drew.weaver () thenap com> wrote:

Has anyone else seen a massive amount of illegitimate UDP 1720 traffic
coming from China being sent towards IP addresses which provide VoIP
services?

I'm talking in the 20-30Gbps range?

The first incident was yesterday at around 13:00 EST, the second incident
was today at 09:00 EST.

I'm assuming this is just another DDoS like all others, but I would be
interested to hear if I am not the only one seeing this.

On list or off-list is fine.

Thanks,
-Drew



-- 
Best Regards
Curtis Maurand
Principal
Xyonet Web Hosting
mailto:cmaurand () xyonet com
http://www.xyonet.com

-- 
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared () puck nether net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.


Current thread: