nanog mailing list archives
Re: Speaking of NTP...
From: Rafael Possamai <rafael () gav ufsc br>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:53:06 -0500
Depending on how exactly you have these servers configured with relation to one another, small variations from one single source can be augmented down the line. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propagation_of_uncertainty On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Matthew Huff <mhuff () ox com> wrote:
We have 5 NTP server: 2 x stratum 1 rubidium oscillator time servers with GPS sync, and 3 servers running NTP 4.2.6p5-3 synced to external internet based NTP stratum 1 servers. We monitor our NTP environment closely, and over the last 10+ years, normally all of our NTP servers are sync'ed within +/- 2 msec. Starting last Friday, we started seeing some remote NTP servers with GPS reference consistently offset by 10 msec. Any one else seeing this? ---- Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd Director of Operations | Purchase, NY 10577 OTA Management LLC | Phone: 914-460-4039 aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-694-5669
Current thread:
- Speaking of NTP... Matthew Huff (Jul 13)
- Re: Speaking of NTP... Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jul 13)
- Re: Speaking of NTP... Rafael Possamai (Jul 16)
- RE: Speaking of NTP... Tony Hain (Jul 16)
- Re: Speaking of NTP... Matthew Huff (Jul 16)
- RE: Speaking of NTP... Tony Hain (Jul 16)