![nanog logo](/images/nanog-logo.png)
nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP DHCPv6 and /48
From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 09:05:53 +1000
In message <CAPkb-7Aice0dSgcc+W7c7R3OSWP_N_sn8m0n306mJx1bGC36Qw () mail gmail com> , Baldur Norddahl writes:
On 10 July 2015 at 13:30, John Curran <jcurran () istaff org> wrote:Baldur - I am not aware of the RIPE practices with respect to IPv6 end-user assignments, but in the ARIN region, ISPs/LIR's make assignments to end users base=don similar practices that the community adopted for ARIN=E2=80=99s end-user assi=gnments.To my knowledge, ARIN does not review these ISP IPv6 end-user assignments (except after the fact and in aggregate if an ISP were to come to ARIN seekin=gan additional IPv6 block due to utilization of the previous.) Differences in policies between the regions is not necessarily any indication of a =E2=80=9Cproblem=E2=80=9D; it can just as easily be an appropriate re=flection ofdifferent underlying circumstances.The RIPE policy https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-641 section 5.4.2 states: "When a single End Site requires an assignment shorter than a /48, it must request the assignment with documentation or materials that justify the request. Requests for multiple or additional prefixes exceeding a /48 assignment for a single End Site will be processed and reviewed (i.e., evaluation of justification) at the RIR/NIR level". For a business user we might go through that process. But my question is about ordinary residential end users where we want to have as little manual processing as possible. Therefore we read the above as "do not do that". We do not entirely disagree with the policy either. I am more looking for a technical solution, that allows us to deliver a /48 yet still be as flexible as possible to the users wants and needs. Regards, Baldur
Well you don't know if it is a single end site or two sharing a common uplink. You could just configure them both for /49's from the /48 and let them worry about ip6.arpa sub delegation. They should be getting a /128 regardless. That said this really isn't your problem. It is their problem. -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka () isc org
Current thread:
- ISP DHCPv6 and /48 Baldur Norddahl (Jul 10)
- Re: ISP DHCPv6 and /48 Mark Andrews (Jul 10)
- Re: ISP DHCPv6 and /48 Baldur Norddahl (Jul 10)
- Re: ISP DHCPv6 and /48 John Curran (Jul 10)
- Re: ISP DHCPv6 and /48 Baldur Norddahl (Jul 11)
- Re: ISP DHCPv6 and /48 Mark Andrews (Jul 11)
- Re: ISP DHCPv6 and /48 Oliver O'Boyle (Jul 11)
- Re: ISP DHCPv6 and /48 Baldur Norddahl (Jul 10)
- Re: ISP DHCPv6 and /48 Mark Andrews (Jul 10)
- Re: ISP DHCPv6 and /48 George, Wes (Jul 10)
- Re: ISP DHCPv6 and /48 Baldur Norddahl (Jul 11)