nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
From: "Ricky Beam" <jfbeam () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 00:10:36 -0400
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 21:19:52 -0400, Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote:
/56 even seems a bit excessive for a residential user, but *shrugs*
That's why some hand out a /60, but only if you ask for it. Otherwise, you get only a single /64.
Of course, HE will give you a /48 at the click of the mouse.
Current thread:
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion, (continued)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Israel G. Lugo (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mike Hammett (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mike Hammett (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Matthew Kaufman (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Paul Ferguson (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Ricky Beam (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Ricky Beam (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Owen DeLong (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Karl Auer (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mike Hammett (Jul 08)
- Re: Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion tqr2813d376cjozqap1l (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Karl Auer (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Paul Ferguson (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Dave Taht (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mike Hammett (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Ricky Beam (Jul 08)