nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 13:27:18 -0400
On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 09:59:51 -0700, Mike Lyon said:
I dont think my customers would see it that way. They would say, "we'll just go with ATT or Comcast instead." Poof, there goes that MRR!
Well, that *is* one way to reduce your dependence on IPv4. :)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion, (continued)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mark Andrews (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Israel G. Lugo (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mike Hammett (Jul 08)
- Message not available
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Owen DeLong (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Israel G. Lugo (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mike Hammett (Jul 05)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 05)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mike Lyon (Jul 05)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 05)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 05)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 06)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 06)
- RE: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Josh Moore (Jul 06)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 06)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mark Tinka (Jul 07)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 08)