nanog mailing list archives

Re: whois server features


From: shawn wilson <ag4ve.us () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 15:18:07 -0500

On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net> wrote:
So, you’re not running into a poorly-documented mystery, you’ve run afoul of one of the rotten armpits of the 
shub-Internet.

So there's no consensus between NICs for the information they should
have in whois and what search mechanisms they should provide? I guess
what you're saying is that whois is just a protocol definition and
nothing else?

Correct.  It gets you a blob of text.  Sometimes, a blob is just a blob.  Other times, it contains what _appear_ to 
be key-value pairs, but are instead loosely-formatted text.  Other times, it contains textually-represented key-value 
pairs that are programmatically generated from an actual database, and can thus be re-imported into another database. 
 Depends what’s on the back end.


This is not the response I was looking for (and reading the RFC makes
me feel even worse).

Is there a better mechanism for querying NICs for host/owner information?


Current thread: