nanog mailing list archives
Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:51:22 +0000
On 28/01/2015 14:45, Colin Johnston wrote:
qnx os based router works well with powerpc, could be pushed far higher load than intel based chips
that may be so, but how many people out there know how to push qnx that hard compared freebsd/linux on amd64 compatible hardware, and how many people know how to configure up a juniper mx or cisco asr9k, compared to the number that can tune a freely available unix. As someone pointed out elsewhere, there's no such thing as a free lunch. If you want to economise on hardware, you should expect to pay for the expertise to do it. Nick
Current thread:
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations, (continued)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Phil Bedard (Jan 27)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Hugo Slabbert (Jan 27)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Eduardo Schoedler (Jan 27)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Jim Shankland (Jan 27)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Robert Bays (Jan 28)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Paul S. (Jan 28)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Robert Bays (Jan 28)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Charles N Wyble (Jan 28)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Colin Johnston (Jan 28)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Mark Tinka (Jan 28)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Nick Hilliard (Jan 28)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Baldur Norddahl (Jan 28)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Eduardo Meyer (Jan 28)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Adrian Chadd (Jan 28)
- Re: scaling linux-based router hardware recommendations Ray Soucy (Jan 29)