nanog mailing list archives
Re: Brocade MLX Feedback
From: Wouter Prins <wp () null0 nl>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:35:38 +0100
Hi Graham, Do you have any special features you need? MLX-e's are great and fulfill most standard environments fine. Full table convergence time is pretty fast on MLX-e's. Be sure to pick the right modules, switch fabrics and management blades (or contact a partner to do it for you) when you go for a mlx-e. You may want to consider the CER-RT (fixed 1U box) if you dont need a modular chassis. On 14 January 2015 at 20:10, Graham Johnston <johnstong () westmancom com> wrote:
We are looking at Brocade MLX routers to act as Internet edge routers. They will initially handle two to four full tables, plus peering on an IX. The price is certainly attractive. We are coming from Cisco 7600 series devices. Can anyone comment about their use of them? Are you happy with them? Any gotchas? Particularly we are interested in convergence time to full FIB population. Thanks, Graham Johnston Network Planner Westman Communications Group 204.717.2829 johnstong () westmancom com<mailto:johnstong () westmancom com> P think green; don't print this email.
-- Wouter Prins wp () null0 nl
Current thread:
- Brocade MLX Feedback Graham Johnston (Jan 14)
- RE: Brocade MLX Feedback Jordan Medlen (Jan 14)
- Re: Brocade MLX Feedback Wouter Prins (Jan 14)
- Re: Brocade MLX Feedback Karsten Elfenbein (Jan 14)
- Re: Brocade MLX Feedback Jeff Sorrels (Jan 14)
- Re: Brocade MLX Feedback Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr (Jan 15)
- RE: Brocade MLX Feedback Romeo Czumbil (Jan 14)