nanog mailing list archives
Re: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality]
From: Stephen Satchell <list () satchell net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 13:56:31 -0800
On 02/27/2015 01:27 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
My 2 cents. I don't design these things, but you'd think people would start realizing that static allocation is kind of limiting. Giving someone 50mb/s with 20mb/s waste is annoying when they are saturating 3mb/s the opposite direction. Wouldn't it be cool if your backup at night could use 50mb/s upstream and drop your downstream to 5mb/s because you aren't downloading anything?
That's possible with multicarrier technology, such as xDSL. When you get into the data-over-cable technology, you find a completely different story -- it's a system limitation that you have an upstream channel that is less efficient than the downstream channel because the upstream channel has to be accessed by a number of sources, with access control, whereas the downstream channel is nothing more than a broadcast pipe (just like 10base-2 Ethernet) where you pick your packets out of the stream. Other technologies have their quirks, too...
Current thread:
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality, (continued)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Michael Thomas (Feb 28)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Clayton Zekelman (Feb 28)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Mike Hammett (Feb 28)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Clayton Zekelman (Feb 28)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Michael Thomas (Feb 28)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Nick Hilliard (Feb 28)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality John Levine (Feb 27)
- Re: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality] Miles Fidelman (Feb 27)
- Re: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality] Scott Helms (Feb 27)
- Re: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality] Jack Bates (Feb 27)
- Re: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality] Stephen Satchell (Feb 27)
- Re: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality] Scott Helms (Feb 27)
- Re: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality] Jack Bates (Feb 27)
- RE: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality] Naslund, Steve (Feb 27)
- Re: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality] Jack Bates (Feb 27)
- RE: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality] Naslund, Steve (Feb 27)
- Re: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality] Miles Fidelman (Feb 27)
- Re: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality] Philip Dorr (Feb 27)
- Re: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality] Mark Tinka (Feb 27)
- Re: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality] Mike Hammett (Feb 28)
- Re: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality] James R Cutler (Feb 28)