nanog mailing list archives
Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space
From: Sebastian Spies <s+Mailinglisten.nanog () sloc de>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 00:36:54 +0100
Am 26.02.2015 um 22:14 schrieb Owen DeLong:
On Feb 26, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Sebastian Spies <s+Mailinglisten.nanog () sloc de> wrote: Am 24.02.2015 um 23:59 schrieb Doug Barton:On 2/24/15 1:42 PM, Michael Helmeste wrote:ARP Networks: https://www.arpnetworks.com/vps Routed IP space (v4 and v6) as well as BGP peering.+1 for Arp, I'm a happy customer (no other affiliation).We are going to do this at datapath.io using AWS and others soon. We do some BGP peering on your behalf and expose some parameters to the VPS via API.Since the requirement included IPv6, I’m not sure how you plan to use AWS.
You are right. Sorry for the sloppiness. OT: There is no way to even let two instances communicate with each other in the same VPC subnet using a protocol other than IPv4, although they transport ethernet headers (no VXLAN). Our only solution was to use v6 load balancers that tunnel with our endpoint on the other side of direct connect.
Current thread:
- Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space, (continued)
- Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space Owen DeLong (Feb 24)
- Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space Zachary Giles (Feb 24)
- Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space Jeff Fisher (Feb 24)
- Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space Tim Raphael (Feb 24)
- Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space Colin Johnston (Feb 24)
- RE: OT: VPS with Routed IP space Michael Helmeste (Feb 24)
- Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space Doug Barton (Feb 24)
- Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space Zachary Giles (Feb 24)
- Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space Sebastian Spies (Feb 26)
- Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space Owen DeLong (Feb 26)
- Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space Sebastian Spies (Feb 26)
- Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space Owen DeLong (Feb 24)
- Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space Jared Mauch (Feb 24)
- Re: OT: VPS with Routed IP space Zachary Giles (Feb 24)