Re: OT - Small DNS "appliances" for remote offices.

[Geoff Mulligan <nanog08 () mulligan org>]

I have used the BeagleBone to run a few simple servers.  I don't know if 
the ethernet port on the Bone is on the USB bus. It is slightly more 
expensive than a PI, but they have worked well for me.

        Geoff

On 02/18/2015 04:44 PM, Peter Loron wrote:
> For any site where you would use a Pi as the DNS cache, it won't be an 
> issue. DNS isn't that heavy at those query rates.
>
> Yeah, it would be awesome if they'd been able to get a SoC that 
> included ethernet.
>
> -Pete
>
> On 2015-02-18 15:08, Robert Webb wrote:
> > What I do not like about the Pi is the network port is on the USB bus
> > and thus limited to USB speeds.
> >
> > <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Maxwell Cole
> > <mcole.mailinglists () gmail com> </div><div>Date:02/18/2015  4:30 PM
> > (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: "nanog () nanog org >> 'NANOG list'"
> > <nanog () nanog org> </div><div>Subject: Re: OT - Small DNS "appliances"
> > for remote offices. </div><div>
> > </div>