nanog mailing list archives
Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office
From: Ray Soucy <rps () maine edu>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 08:31:46 -0500
Honestly, in a lot of cases you don't even need a device to support packet capture as a feature to add it as a feature once its compromised. This is just FUD IMHO. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Paul Nash <paul () nashnetworks ca> wrote:
I love the built-in remote packet captures,You, the NSA, and lots and lots of hackers, ALL love the remote packet capture. If Meraki support can turn it on, so can someone who penetrates their systems (by getting a job there or by hacking), and then they get to see everything happening INSIDE your network. Not just your WAN traffic, which would be bad enough. paul
-- Ray Patrick Soucy Network Engineer University of Maine System T: 207-561-3526 F: 207-561-3531 MaineREN, Maine's Research and Education Network www.maineren.net
Current thread:
- Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Dennis Bohn (Feb 01)
- Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Mike Hammett (Feb 01)
- RE: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Eric C. Miller (Feb 01)
- Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Lewis, Mitchell T. (Feb 01)
- Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Tim Franklin (Feb 02)
- Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Sean Hunter (Feb 03)
- Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Paul Nash (Feb 04)
- Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Ray Soucy (Feb 04)
- Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Paul Nash (Feb 04)
- RE: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Eric C. Miller (Feb 01)
- Re: Recommended wireless AP for 400 users office Mike Hammett (Feb 01)