nanog mailing list archives

RE: Low cost WDM gear


From: David Boisseleau <dboisseleau () fonex com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 23:42:26 +0000

Hi Mike,

You should try CYAN inc and the Z series. (US based) Very solid platform and very strong warranty.


David Boisseleau


-----Original Message-----
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+dboisseleau=fonex.com () nanog org] On Behalf Of Colin Johnston
Sent: February-07-15 6:29 PM
To: Tim Durack
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Low cost WDM gear

Yes can do long distances without need to amplifier site (train tracks for example) but you need to make sure ground is 
stable and if using track bed of train track that the ballast is good and stable else ground tremors affect the signal 
quality.

Colin



On 7 Feb 2015, at 22:32, Tim Durack <tdurack () gmail com> wrote:

You can do ~500km without inline amplifier sites using 
EDFA+Raman+ROPA, but you are going to need some serious optical engineering to make that work.
The more standard way to do it is amplifier sites every 80-100km for EDFA.
If you are doing 10GigE you will need to allow for DCM also.

On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote:

One particular route I'm looking at is 185 miles, so of the options 
presented 300 km is closest. ;-)




-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

----- Original Message -----

From: "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
To: "Kenneth McRae" <kenneth.mcrae () me com>
Cc: "NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>
Sent: Saturday, February 7, 2015 12:02:11 PM
Subject: Re: Low cost WDM gear

would be good for mike to define 'long distances' here, is it:
2km
30km
300km
3000km

Probably the 30-60k range is what you mean by 'long distances' but...
clarity might help.

On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Kenneth McRae <kenneth.mcrae () me com>
wrote:
Mike,

I just replaced a bunch of FiberStore WDM passive muxes with OSI 
Hardware equipment. The FiberStore gear was a huge disappointment 
(excessive loss, poor technical support, refusal to issue refund 
without threatening legal action, etc.). I have had good results 
from the OSI equipment so far. I run passive muxes for CWDM (8 - 16 channels).

On Feb 07, 2015, at 09:51 AM, Manuel Marín <mmg () transtelco net> wrote:

Hi Mike

I can recommend a couple of vendors that provide cost effective
solutions.
Ekinops & Packetlight.

On Saturday, February 7, 2015, Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote:

I know there are various Asian vendors for low cost (less than $500)
muxes
to throw 16 or however many colors onto a strand. However, they 
don't
work
so well when you don't control the optics used on both sides 
(therefore must use standard wavelengths), obviously only do a 
handful of channels
and
have a distance limitation.
What solutions are out there that don't cost an arm and a leg?
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


--
TRANSTELCO| Manuel Marin | VP Engineering | US: *+1 915-217-2232* | MX:
*+52
656-257-1109*

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication is intended only for the 
use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may 
contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt 
from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended 
recipient of this information, you are notified that any use, 
dissemination, distribution,
or
copying of the communication is strictly prohibited.

AVISO DE CONFIDENCIALIDAD: Esta comunicación es sólo para el uso de 
la persona o entidad a la que se dirige y puede contener información 
privilegiada, confidencial y exenta de divulgación bajo la 
legislación aplicable. Si no es el destinatario de esta información, 
se le notifica
que
cualquier uso, difusión, distribución o copia de la comunicación 
está estrictamente prohibido.




--
Tim:>


Current thread: