nanog mailing list archives

Re: FTTx Active-Ethernet Hardware


From: Carlos Alcantar <carlos () race com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 05:11:28 +0000

We run Calix GPON / AE Platform works fairly nicely but does have it¹s
cost.


Carlos Alcantar
Race Communications / Race Team Member
1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010
Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / carlos () race com / http://www.race.com
<http://www.race.com/>






On 2/10/15, 1:27 PM, "Mark Tinka" <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote:


On 10/Feb/15 21:35, Frank Bulk wrote:
Unless each customer has in their own L3 domain, you'll also want some
kind
of L2 isolation between ports (and also MFF) and IP source address
verification (so that people can't spoof addresses) for both DHPC and
static
IP customers.  And don't forget the IPv6 equivalents.

You can get all that in a decent Active-E-based AN (as you would in a
GPON AN). But then the price starts to go up if you want this in
software as opposed to doing funky things.

Cisco's ME2600X was, for me, one of the first proper Active-E FTTH AN's
with features required in FTTH deployments (split horizon for Layer 2
customer separation, DHCP Option 82 support, per-port level trTCM
ingress and egress policing and queuing, EVC's, e.t.c.).

I understand it is now being replaced by the ASR920, which is a little
odd if you look at port density differences between the two alone.

For the GPON-centric, it is also being replaced by Cisco's ME4605 GPON AN.

Final date to buy any ME2600X's will be June 2015.

Mark.




Current thread: