nanog mailing list archives
Re: DHCPv6 PD & Routing Questions
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 16:05:44 -0800
On Nov 25, 2015, at 15:59 , Mark Andrews <marka () isc org> wrote: In message <CAMWxDfrh+O=SPZwPmAZhYnvAEeK2eMFw3CD0qf34Fkbb=-SaPw () mail gmail com>, Brian Knight writes:On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com> wrote:DHCPv6-PD allows multiple PD requests. But did anyone actually implement that? I am not aware of any device that will hand out sub delegations on one interface, notice that it is out of address space and then go request more space from the upstream router (*). DHCPv6-PD allows size hints, but it is often ignored. Also there is no guidance for what prefix sizes you should ask for. Many CPEs will ask for /48. If you got a /48 you will give out that /48 and then not honor any further requests, because only one /48 per site is allowed. If you are an ISP that gives out /48 and your customers CPE asks for a /56 you will still ignore his size hint and give him /48.Or, worse, the ISP's DHCPv6 server honors the new request and issues the larger prefix, but refuses to route it. Ran into that myself when I replaced my home CPE router, and changed the prefix hint to ask for a /60 block (expanded from /64) at the same time. That made for a frustrating few days without IPv6 service, waiting for my original delegation to expire. (Tech support, of course, had no clue and blamed my router.) In retrospect I should have perhaps had my original CPE generate a DHCP release message for that prefix before disconnecting it. But I won't be the last person to fail to generate that. -BrianWell the requesting router could announce the route. ISC's client has hooks that allow this to be done. That is, after all, how routing is designed to work. The DHCP server usually is sitting in a data center on the other side of the country with zero ability to inject approptiate routes.
Are you really suggesting that a residential ISP accept routes advertised from their customer’s CPE? Really? That’s about the most ridiculous thing I’ve heard on NANOG in a long time and that’s saying something.
The DHCP relay could also have injected routes but that is a second class solution.
Maybe, but in an ISP/Customer PD environment, it’s certainly preferable to what you consider a “first class” solution. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: DHCPv6 PD & Routing Questions Owen DeLong (Dec 05)
- Re: DHCPv6 PD & Routing Questions Mark Andrews (Dec 05)
- Re: DHCPv6 PD & Routing Questions Baldur Norddahl (Dec 06)
- Re: DHCPv6 PD & Routing Questions Owen DeLong (Dec 06)
- Re: DHCPv6 PD & Routing Questions Brett Frankenberger (Dec 06)
- Re: DHCPv6 PD & Routing Questions Owen DeLong (Dec 06)
- Re: DHCPv6 PD & Routing Questions Baldur Norddahl (Dec 06)
- Re: DHCPv6 PD & Routing Questions Mark Andrews (Dec 05)