nanog mailing list archives
Re: VPLS Providers
From: Chris Burwell <cburwell () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 20:49:58 -0500
I appreciate the suggestion! That's something to consider if our requirements expand globally. Right now the focus is N.A., but I threw EMEA & APAC in there. I've had enough trouble with broadcast storms and other issues in N.A., so I don't have much of an appetite for magnifying those issues on a global scale! - Chris On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote:
On Thursday, December 31, 2015, Chris Burwell <cburwell () gmail com> wrote:Hi NANOG, I'm looking to solicit feedback on VPLS providers. The requirement is for connectivity among about ten sites in North America, however feedback for providers that also extend service to EMEA and APAC would also be welcome. All types of feedback are appreciated (good, bad, and anything in between). Thanks, - ChrisSorry for the meta suggestion, but i think you would be much happier with an L3 vpn. It is a more common offering and avoid transcontinental broadcast storms
Current thread:
- VPLS Providers Chris Burwell (Dec 31)
- Re: VPLS Providers Ca By (Dec 31)
- Re: VPLS Providers Chris Burwell (Dec 31)
- Re: VPLS Providers Ca By (Dec 31)