Re: de-peering for security sake

[Hugo Slabbert <hugo () slabnet com>]

Just in case I missed the /s on there:

> Maybe such a format already exists and just isn't widely used.

It does and it isn't.

http://www.x-arf.org/

--
Hugo
hugo () slabnet com: email, xmpp/jabber
also on Signal

---- From: Clayton Zekelman <clayton () mnsi net> -- Sent: 2015-12-25 - 14:12 ----

> Just an off the cuff thought but if the format of the abuse messages could be standardized so handling them would be 
> semi-automated somewhat like ACNS notices, it might improve response.
>
> Maybe such a format already exists and just isn't widely used.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Dec 25, 2015, at 4:52 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 25 Dec 2015, Colin Johnston wrote:
> > >
> > > why do the chinese network folks never reply and action abuse reports, normal slow speed network abuse is 
> > > tolerated, but not high speed deliberate abuse albeit compromised machines
> >
> > This is not a chinese problem, this is a general ISP problem. Most ISPs do not respond to abuse reports.
> >
> > --
> > Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike () swm pp se

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP/MIME digital signature