nanog mailing list archives
Re: reliably detecting the presence of a bridge?
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 18:14:02 +0100
In the end, there seems to be no "reliable" way to ask the network my question. But... WOW! Thank you all for your interesting and clever techniques!
Current thread:
- reliably detecting the presence of a bridge? Dave Taht (Dec 15)
- Re: reliably detecting the presence of a bridge? Jared Mauch (Dec 15)
- Re: reliably detecting the presence of a bridge? Matthew Kaufman (Dec 15)
- Re: reliably detecting the presence of a bridge? William Herrin (Dec 15)
- Re: reliably detecting the presence of a bridge? Dave Taht (Dec 16)
- Re: reliably detecting the presence of a bridge? Masataka Ohta (Dec 16)
- Message not available
- Re: reliably detecting the presence of a bridge? Carsten Bormann (Dec 16)
- RE: reliably detecting the presence of a bridge? Chuck Church (Dec 16)
- Re: reliably detecting the presence of a bridge? Anoop Ghanwani (Dec 16)
- Re: reliably detecting the presence of a bridge? Dave Taht (Dec 19)
- Re: reliably detecting the presence of a bridge? Dave Taht (Dec 16)
- Re: reliably detecting the presence of a bridge? William Herrin (Dec 19)
- Re: reliably detecting the presence of a bridge? Larry Sheldon (Dec 19)
- Re: reliably detecting the presence of a bridge? John Levine (Dec 19)
- Re: reliably detecting the presence of a bridge? James R Cutler (Dec 19)
- Re: reliably detecting the presence of a bridge? Larry Sheldon (Dec 19)
- Re: reliably detecting the presence of a bridge? Larry Sheldon (Dec 19)