nanog mailing list archives

Re: Nat

From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:28:56 +1100

+1000000

Nobody should have to be doing NAT today.

We need to make IPv4 painful to use.  Adding  delay between SYN and SYN/ACK would
be one way to achieve this.  Start at 100ms..200ms and increase it by 100ms each year.

Mark

On 17/12/2015, at 9:38 AM, "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood () cable comcast com> wrote:

IPv4 NAT!? Free yourself from the tyranny of shared addresses. ;-)

http://www.comcast6.net/images/files/revolt.jpg       


Jason

Current thread:

Re: Nat, (continued)
- - - Re: Nat Netideainc (Dec 17)
    - Re: Nat Ahmed Munaf (Dec 18)
    - RE: Nat Tony Wicks (Dec 16)
    - Re: Nat Ahmed Munaf (Dec 17)
    - Re: Nat Nick Hilliard (Dec 17)
    - Re: Nat Ahmed Munaf (Dec 18)
    - Re: Nat Matt Palmer (Dec 18)
- Re: Nat Octavio Alvarez (Dec 16)
- Re: Nat Livingood, Jason (Dec 16)
  - Re: Nat Josh Reynolds (Dec 16)
  - Re: Nat Mark Andrews (Dec 16)
    - Re: Nat alvin nanog (Dec 16)
    - Re: Nat Larry Sheldon (Dec 16)
    - Re: Nat Charles Monson (Dec 16)
    - Re: Nat Mark Andrews (Dec 16)
    - Re: Nat Mel Beckman (Dec 16)
    - Re: Nat Larry Sheldon (Dec 16)
    - Re: Nat Mark Andrews (Dec 16)
    - Re: Nat Stephen Satchell (Dec 16)
    - Re: Nat Lee Howard (Dec 18)
    - Re: Nat Owen DeLong (Dec 18)

(Thread continues...)