nanog mailing list archives
Re: Nat
From: Ahmed Munaf <ahmed.dalaali () hrins net>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 19:36:19 +0300
In addition to the limited concurrent sessions for ASR1000, we are facing some issue with many users how are playing online games! Nat problems! Ahmed,
On Dec 16, 2015, at 7:22 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote: On 16/Dec/15 12:45, Ahmed Munaf wrote:Yes, we are using ASR1004 for NAT, we are considering A10 or Citrix or F5. we’ve not decided till now! maybe we change it to another product, if anyone give us a better solution. this will be used for ISP’s users.The ASR1000 is not a bad large scale NAT device. Are there any specific issues you are facing with it? Mark.
Current thread:
- Nat Ahmed Munaf (Dec 15)
- RE: Nat Tony Wicks (Dec 16)
- Re: Nat Ahmed Munaf (Dec 17)
- Re: Nat Nick Hilliard (Dec 17)
- Re: Nat Ahmed Munaf (Dec 18)
- Re: Nat Matt Palmer (Dec 18)