Re: Production-scale NAT64

[Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com>]

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 8:16 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:

> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 07:28:08 -0700, Ca By said:
>
> > Another relevant metric, less than 25% of my mobile subscribers traffic
> > require NAT64 translating.  75+% of bits flows through end-to-end IPv6
> > (thanks Google/Youtube, Facebook, Netflix, Yahoo, Linkedin and so on
> ...).
>
> So I'm guessing that 75% of the traffic flows with better latency than
> the 25% IPvhorse-n-buggy traffic? ;)
Facebook says IPv6 is 20-40% faster

http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/blog/2015/04/facebook-news-feeds-load-20-40-faster-over-ipv6/

Another way to look at it, IPv4 is 20-40% slower than IPv6.