nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering + Transit Circuits
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 17:16:08 +0200
On 19/Aug/15 01:12, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Normally a router gets a packet and sends it on its way without looking at the source. However, if you have a router at the IX which has _only_ peer routes and your routes, that solves the problem. If I send you a packet for Comcast, your peering router will drop it and send an ICMP Network Unreachable. No filters to manage, no RIRs to sync, nothing to code, etc.
This is what we do, and to make it more interesting, we have 0/0 and ::/0 on these dedicated peering routers pointing to Null0. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits, (continued)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Faisal Imtiaz (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Pshem Kowalczyk (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Faisal Imtiaz (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits John Osmon (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Faisal Imtiaz (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Pshem Kowalczyk (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Faisal Imtiaz (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Faisal Imtiaz (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Bob Evans (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Faisal Imtiaz (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 18)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Mark Tinka (Aug 25)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Jon Lewis (Aug 19)
- Re: Peering + Transit Circuits Andy Davidson (Aug 19)