nanog mailing list archives

Re: BGP offloading (fixing legacy router BGP scalability issues)


From: Faisal Imtiaz <faisal () snappytelecom net>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 18:20:34 +0000 (GMT)

How do you see this as a 'censoring' activity ?

If the Op has a default route on their side, along with the reduced route table, at best you have less than optimal 
routing...

Regards

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bryan Tong" <contact () nullivex com>
To: "Max Tulyev" <maxtul () netassist ua>
Cc: nanog () nanog org
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 2:01:30 PM
Subject: Re: BGP offloading (fixing legacy router BGP scalability issues)

As a network consumer and network provider. The traffic seen by the
customer should not be censored. It should be up to the consumer to protect
their services.

I accept the risk and want uncensored internet access and provide such to
our customers.
On Apr 2, 2015 11:26 AM, "Max Tulyev" <maxtul () netassist ua> wrote:

Hello!

Very good idea is to sell that and change it to softrouter based on
PC/Linux/BIRD. Config can work like 6500/SUP750 will cost much less than
$1k.

On 04/01/15 20:01, Frederik Kriewitz wrote:
We're wondering if anyone has experience with such a setup?





Current thread: