nanog mailing list archives
Re: Peering and Network Cost
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 23:32:01 -0700
On Apr 19, 2015, at 2:34 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote: The age of the Ethernet switch has little to do with its performance, unless it has everything to do with its performance.
Mark, you realize that this is what NANOG will make sure is engraved on your headstone, right? -Bill
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Current thread:
- Re: Peering and Network Cost, (continued)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mark Tinka (Apr 15)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Max Tulyev (Apr 17)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Max Tulyev (Apr 17)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mark Tinka (Apr 17)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Baldur Norddahl (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost William Waites (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Jason Lixfeld (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mike Hammett (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Jay Hanke (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mark Tinka (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Bill Woodcock (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mark Tinka (Apr 19)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Max Tulyev (Apr 21)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mark Tinka (Apr 21)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Max Tulyev (Apr 21)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mark Tinka (Apr 21)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mike Hammett (Apr 15)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Tore Anderson (Apr 15)
- Re: Peering and Network Cost Mark Tinka (Apr 15)