nanog mailing list archives
RE: Cisco/Level3 takedown
From: Steve Mikulasik <Steve.Mikulasik () civeo com>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 16:06:17 +0000
Seems like it this is pretty ineffective. The group already moved subnets once, they will likely do this again, all Cisco/L3 have done is slow them down a bit. Stephen Mikulasik -----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces () nanog org] On Behalf Of Sameer Khosla Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 9:31 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Cisco/Level3 takedown Was just reading http://blogs.cisco.com/security/talos/sshpsychos then checking my routing tables. Looks like the two /23's they mention are now being advertised as /24's, and I'm also not sure why cisco published the ssh attack dictionary. It seems to me that this is something that if they want to do, they should be working with entire service provider community, not just one provider. Thanks Sameer Khosla Managing Director Neutral Data Centers Corp. Twitter: @skhoslaTO
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco/Level3 takedown, (continued)
- Re: Cisco/Level3 takedown Christopher Morrow (Apr 09)
- Re: Cisco/Level3 takedown Jeff Shultz (Apr 09)
- Re: Cisco/Level3 takedown Christopher Morrow (Apr 09)
- Re: Cisco/Level3 takedown Bill Woodcock (Apr 09)
- Re: Cisco/Level3 takedown Barry Shein (Apr 09)
- Re: Cisco/Level3 takedown Matt Olney (molney) (Apr 09)
- Re: Cisco/Level3 takedown Chris Boyd (Apr 09)
- Re: Cisco/Level3 takedown Edouard Chamillard (Apr 09)
- Re: Cisco/Level3 takedown Mike Jones (Apr 11)
- Re: Cisco/Level3 takedown Mike Hammett (Apr 11)