nanog mailing list archives
Re: Small IX IP Blocks
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 18:49:37 -0400
On Sat, 04 Apr 2015 16:06:02 -0500, Mike Hammett said:
I am starting up a small IX. The thought process was a /24 for every IX location (there will be multiple of them geographically disparate), even though we nqever expected anywhere near that many on a given fabric. Then okay, how do
< we d o v6? We got a /48, so the thought was a /64 for each. You probably want a /56 for each so you can hand a /64 to each customner. That way, customer isolation becomes easy because it's a routing problem. If customers share a subnet, it gets a little harder....
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Small IX IP Blocks Mike Hammett (Apr 04)
- Re: Small IX IP Blocks Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 04)
- Re: Small IX IP Blocks Mike Hammett (Apr 04)
- Re: Small IX IP Blocks Karl Auer (Apr 04)
- Re: Small IX IP Blocks Brendan Halley (Apr 04)
- Re: Small IX IP Blocks Mike Hammett (Apr 04)
- Re: Small IX IP Blocks Laszlo Hanyecz (Apr 04)
- Re: Small IX IP Blocks Charles Gucker (Apr 04)
- Re: Small IX IP Blocks Bill Woodcock (Apr 04)
- RE: Small IX IP Blocks Paul Stewart (Apr 05)
- Re: Small IX IP Blocks Will Hargrave (Apr 05)
- Re: Small IX IP Blocks Mike Hammett (Apr 04)
- Re: Small IX IP Blocks Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 04)
- Re: Small IX IP Blocks Mark Tinka (Apr 04)