nanog mailing list archives
Re: Bare TLD resolutions
From: "John Levine" <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 21 Sep 2014 14:53:12 -0000
In article <alpine.LSU.2.00.1409190959570.3000 () hermes-1 csi cam ac uk> you write:
David Conrad <drc () virtualized org> wrote:To be clear, generic TLDs (gTLDs) can’t have bare (dotless) TLDs (or wildcards).Wildcards are being used for the name collision gubbins.
;; ANSWER SECTION: *.prod. 3600 IN A 127.0.53.53
Yes, but only for a few months before the TLD goes live to try and flush out prior local use of new TLDs. The rule about wildcards in live TLDs hasn't changed. There was a lot about this at Verisign's name collision workshop after the London IETF. http://namecollisions.net/program/index.html R's, John
Current thread:
- Bare TLD resolutions Jay Ashworth (Sep 17)
- Re: Bare TLD resolutions David Conrad (Sep 17)
- Re: Bare TLD resolutions Jay Ashworth (Sep 17)
- Re: Bare TLD resolutions Doug Barton (Sep 17)
- Re: Bare TLD resolutions David Conrad (Sep 17)
- Re: Bare TLD resolutions Jay Ashworth (Sep 17)
- Re: Bare TLD resolutions Eric Brunner-Williams (Sep 17)
- Re: Bare TLD resolutions David Conrad (Sep 17)
- Re: Bare TLD resolutions Tony Finch (Sep 19)
- Re: Bare TLD resolutions David Conrad (Sep 19)
- Re: Bare TLD resolutions John Levine (Sep 21)
- Re: Bare TLD resolutions Jay Ashworth (Sep 17)
- Re: Bare TLD resolutions David Conrad (Sep 17)
- Re: Bare TLD resolutions Jay Ashworth (Sep 17)
- Re: Bare TLD resolutions Andrew Sullivan (Sep 17)
- Re: Bare TLD resolutions Mark Andrews (Sep 17)
- Re: Bare TLD resolutions Jay Ashworth (Sep 17)
- Re: Bare TLD resolutions Mark Andrews (Sep 17)
- Re: Bare TLD resolutions Andrew Sullivan (Sep 17)