nanog mailing list archives
Re: Multicast Internet Route table.
From: "William F. Maton Sotomayor" <wmaton () ottix net>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 13:08:45 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 2 Sep 2014, Jeff Tantsura wrote:
It is not the network devices per se, it is additional configuration, security, MSDP peering, etc, i.e. OPEX Business justification for such effort is not obvious, (most of multicast deployments I have done in my previous life were because I loved the technology, not because of business needs :))
Ditto, although business needs played a part as well. :) wfms
Current thread:
- Multicast Internet Route table. S, Somasundaram (Somasundaram) (Sep 01)
- Re: Multicast Internet Route table. William F. Maton Sotomayor (Sep 02)
- Re: Multicast Internet Route table. John Kristoff (Sep 02)
- Re: Multicast Internet Route table. Corey Touchet (Sep 02)
- Re: Multicast Internet Route table. Justin M. Streiner (Sep 02)
- Re: Multicast Internet Route table. William Herrin (Sep 02)
- Re: Multicast Internet Route table. Octavio Alvarez (Sep 02)
- Re: Multicast Internet Route table. Jeff Tantsura (Sep 02)
- Re: Multicast Internet Route table. William F. Maton Sotomayor (Sep 02)
- Re: Multicast Internet Route table. Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 02)
- Re: Multicast Internet Route table. Dale W. Carder (Sep 02)
- Re: Multicast Internet Route table. Greg Shepherd (Sep 02)
- Re: Multicast Internet Route table. Corey Touchet (Sep 02)
- Re: Multicast Internet Route table. Michael Hallgren (Sep 02)
- Re: Multicast Internet Route table. John Kristoff (Sep 02)