nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP per-flow load balancing between eBGP and iBGP learned prefix
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:32:36 -0400
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> wrote:
On Sep 16, 2014, at 10:33 PM, Andy Litzinger <andy.litzinger.lists () gmail com> wrote:I appreciate any ideas!My idea mainly centers around the operational complexity and difficulty of troubleshooting a setup of this nature.
yes, this.
Why not just let routing take its natural course? Or at most, play some simple preference games which have consistent outcomes?
I think he's only getting default from his provider(s), which is a shame, get full routes instead and then play the preferences off...(I think).
This kind of thing is generally far more trouble than it's worth, in my experience.
this, yes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Equo ne credite, Teucri. -- Laocoön
Current thread:
- BGP per-flow load balancing between eBGP and iBGP learned prefix Andy Litzinger (Sep 18)
- Re: BGP per-flow load balancing between eBGP and iBGP learned prefix Roland Dobbins (Sep 18)
- Re: BGP per-flow load balancing between eBGP and iBGP learned prefix Christopher Morrow (Sep 18)
- Re: BGP per-flow load balancing between eBGP and iBGP learned prefix Baldur Norddahl (Sep 19)
- Re: BGP per-flow load balancing between eBGP and iBGP learned prefix Roland Dobbins (Sep 18)