nanog mailing list archives
Re: upstream support for flowspec
From: John Kristoff <jtk () cymru com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:06:34 -0500
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:53:52 -0400 Daniel Corbe <corbe () corbe net> wrote:
Is there anything in the air about widening the adoption base? Cisco? Brocade?
I've seen some suggesting that increased support, but even at Juniper, actions seem to speak larger than words. There seems to be very little interest for awhile now. However, I do know of some providers who use it, largely internal only. We also have tried a community flow-spec service, and more recently have been prototyping a community RTBH server with flow-spec capability (ping me off list if you want to hear more or see me at NANOG 62). A few people have recently told me they would like our community RTBH service via flow-spec instead of just BGP next hop, but really only one seemed seriously intent on configuring it day one. John
Current thread:
- upstream support for flowspec Daniel Corbe (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec John Kristoff (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec joel jaeggli (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec Christopher Morrow (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec Saku Ytti (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec Daniel Corbe (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec Daniel Corbe (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec Job Snijders (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec Job Snijders (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec joel jaeggli (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec Daniel Corbe (Sep 18)
- Re: upstream support for flowspec John Kristoff (Sep 18)