nanog mailing list archives
Re: 2000::/6
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 22:41:38 +0900
According to https://stat.ripe.net/2000%3A%3A%2F6#tabId=routing "2000::/6 is visible by 79% of 92 IPv6 RIS full peers."This problem has been solved.do we mark it up to pixie dust, or do we get an actual post mortem?I talked to folks at 3549, they had a few tickets on it that took care of that.
maybe i am more than usually st00pid this evening, but i am no smarter on what actually happened, how it was detected/reported by/to someone who could fix it, and how it was fixed. you know, a basic post mortem, so some of us could learn a lesson or two. randy
Current thread:
- 2000::/6 Tarko Tikan (Sep 10)
- Re: 2000::/6 Alain Hebert (Sep 10)
- Re: 2000::/6 Wouter Prins (Sep 10)
- Re: 2000::/6 Job Snijders (Sep 10)
- Re: 2000::/6 Randy Bush (Sep 11)
- Re: 2000::/6 Jared Mauch (Sep 11)
- Re: 2000::/6 Randy Bush (Sep 11)
- Re: 2000::/6 Tarko Tikan (Sep 12)
- Re: 2000::/6 Nick Hilliard (Sep 12)
- Re: 2000::/6 Tarko Tikan (Sep 12)
- Re: 2000::/6 Owen DeLong (Sep 12)
- Re: 2000::/6 Tarko Tikan (Sep 13)
- Re: 2000::/6 Jimmy Hess (Sep 14)
- Re: 2000::/6 Nick Hilliard (Sep 14)
- Re: 2000::/6 Brett Frankenberger (Sep 14)
- Re: 2000::/6 Tarko Tikan (Sep 15)
- Re: 2000::/6 Owen DeLong (Sep 16)
- Re: 2000::/6 Randy Bush (Sep 11)
- Re: 2000::/6 Alain Hebert (Sep 10)