Re: Industry standard bandwidth guarantee?

[Joe Greco <jgreco () ns sol net>]

> You can't just ignore protocol overhead (or any system's overhead). If an
> application requires X bits per second of actual payload, then your system
> should be designed properly and take into account overhead, as well as
> failure rates, peak utilization hours, etc. This is valid for networking,
> automobile production, etc etc..


Are you saying that the service provider should take into account overhead?
And report the amount of bandwidth available for payload?  Even there we
have some wiggle room, but at least it is something the customer will be
able to work out (IP header overhead, etc).

If not, I'm at a bit of a loss.  As a customer, how do I identify that my
traffic is actually going over an ATM-over-MPLS-over-VPN-over-whatever-
other-bitrobbing-tech circuit and that I should only expect to see 60% of
the speed advertised?

... JG
-- 
Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net
"We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I
won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN)
With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.