nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP Shaping Hardware
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:08:29 +0100
On 20/10/2014 11:12, Roland Dobbins wrote:
Is QoS in the network infrastructure coupled with strictly-enforced quotas insufficient to needs?
for satellite, no.
These permanently-inline boxes and blades that dork around with general Internet traffic to/from eyeball networks can be a support/troubleshooting headache . . .
s/headache/nightmare/ The high latency and bandwidth costs on satellite connections are a world of pain. It should show how awful things are when you can actually improve things by installing inline bandwidth accelerators and traffic shapers. Nick
Current thread:
- ISP Shaping Hardware Skeeve Stevens (Oct 19)
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Roland Dobbins (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Nick Hilliard (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Skeeve Stevens (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Nurul Islam Roman (Oct 20)
- RE: ISP Shaping Hardware Tony Wicks (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Skeeve Stevens (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Rafael Possamai (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Eduardo Schoedler (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Rafael Possamai (Oct 20)
- Message not available
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Alex Nderitu (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Мурат Каипов (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Aftab Siddiqui (Oct 20)
- Re: ISP Shaping Hardware Roland Dobbins (Oct 20)