nanog mailing list archives
Re: Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 04:22:58 +0900
On Oct 19, 2014, at 2:20 AM, George Herbert <george.herbert () gmail com> wrote:
You should restate the "predates"; I was on console on earthquake.berkeley.edu at the time Loma Prieta let go, using among other things (then) Forumnet (now) ICB in a chat, and one of the immediate damage indications was that everyone at UC Santa Cruz dropped offline.
…and I was one of those people at UCSC, who had an interesting little adventure driving home to Berkeley the next day. Also, there are probably people in Northridge and Napa who might dispute your definition of “major,” but yes,a I take your point. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994_Northridge_earthquake http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Baja_California_earthquake http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_South_Napa_earthquake -Bill
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Current thread:
- Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience Jay Ashworth (Oct 18)
- Re: Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience George Herbert (Oct 18)
- Re: Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience Jay Ashworth (Oct 18)
- Re: Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience Bill Woodcock (Oct 18)
- Re: Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience Jay Ashworth (Oct 18)
- Re: Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience Bill Woodcock (Oct 18)
- Re: Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience George Herbert (Oct 19)
- Re: Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience Eliot Lear (Oct 19)
- Re: Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience Jim Shankland (Oct 19)
- Re: Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience Jay Ashworth (Oct 19)
- Re: Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience Pete Carah (Oct 19)
- Re: Major California Faults Ready To Rupture | IFLScience George Herbert (Oct 18)