nanog mailing list archives

Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules


From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner () cluebyfour org>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:50:08 -0500 (EST)

On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:

On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:34:50 -0500, "Justin M. Streiner" said:

No salesperson is likely to do that for you.  They know only to well that
eliminating vendor lock-in means they will lose sales on artificially
costly optics from $vendor to a lower-cost rival.  Less sales = less
commission for the affected sales person.

I suspect that losing the commission on a few $6digit chassis sales is worse
than losing the commission on a $3digit optic?

That turns into a forest > trees problem. Many salescritters don't think about the larger picture, or the responsible business units don't care about what affects other business units. Also, in the 10G-and-up world, most of those optics are a lot more than $3digits.

jms


Current thread: