nanog mailing list archives
Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 08:27:12 +0200
On Tuesday, November 11, 2014 01:00:54 AM Christopher Morrow wrote:
why thought? Justification is really about having a use for the ips, right? and if you have 500 servers/network-devices ... then you have justification for a /23 ... it seems to me.
Unless Equinix have an actual product called OoB, in which case it automatically comes with a /30, or /126. Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions, (continued)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Bill Woodcock (Nov 10)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Christopher Morrow (Nov 10)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 11)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Justin M. Streiner (Nov 11)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions ryanL (Nov 11)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Randy Bush (Nov 11)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Christopher Morrow (Nov 11)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Randy Bush (Nov 12)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Christopher Morrow (Nov 12)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Doug Barton (Nov 12)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Mark Tinka (Nov 10)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Joe Greco (Nov 10)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Jeroen Massar (Nov 10)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Ruairi Carroll (Nov 10)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Brett Frankenberger (Nov 10)