nanog mailing list archives
Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions
From: Alistair Mackenzie <magicsata () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:38:55 +0000
Couldn't you put a router or VPN system on the single IP they are giving you and use RFC1918 addressing space? OOB doesn't normally justify a /24 let alone a /23. On 10 November 2014 13:18, Ruairi Carroll <ruairi.carroll () gmail com> wrote:
Dear List, I've got an upcoming deployment in Equinix (DC10) and I'm struggling to find a provider who can give me a 100Mbit port (With a commit of about 5-10Mbit) with a /23 or /24 of public space , for OOB purposes. We had hoped to use Equinixs services, however they're limiting us to a single public IP. I'm also open to other solutions - xDSL or similar, but emphasis is on cheap and on-net. Cheers /Ruairi
Current thread:
- Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Ruairi Carroll (Nov 10)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Alistair Mackenzie (Nov 10)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Ruairi Carroll (Nov 10)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Paul S. (Nov 10)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Christopher Morrow (Nov 10)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Bill Woodcock (Nov 10)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Christopher Morrow (Nov 10)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 11)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Justin M. Streiner (Nov 11)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions ryanL (Nov 11)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Randy Bush (Nov 11)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Christopher Morrow (Nov 11)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Ruairi Carroll (Nov 10)
- Re: Equinix Virginia - Ethernet OOB suggestions Alistair Mackenzie (Nov 10)