nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google)
From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 21:46:06 -0400
On Thursday, May 22, 2014, Martin Hannigan <hannigan () gmail com> wrote:
On Thursday, May 22, 2014, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','rubensk () gmail com');>> wrote:Jared, Akamai has been v6 enabled for years. Customers have choices and knowbest.Isn't your network still offering both as customer choices? :-)Making new customers dual-stack by default for the last two years would have gone far in increasing IPv6, unless Akamai is only losing customers to other CDNs instead of getting new ones... RubensMy job isn't to increase v6. It's to make sure we can serve traffic over protocols we are asked to. We are dual stacked which means our customers are.
And correcting typo. Apologies, slippery thumbs Best, -M<
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google), (continued)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Sholes, Joshua (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) manning (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Michael Brown (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Martin Hannigan (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Jared Mauch (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Julien Goodwin (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Christopher Morrow (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Geoff Huston (May 23)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Rubens Kuhl (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Martin Hannigan (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Martin Hannigan (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Lee Howard (May 23)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Lee Howard (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Matthew Petach (May 22)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Ryan Rawdon (May 28)
- Re: IPv6 at 50% for VZW (Re: NAT IP and Google) Matthew Petach (May 28)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Mark Andrews (May 21)
- Message not available
- Re: NAT IP and Google Larry Sheldon (May 21)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Derek Andrew (May 22)
- Re: NAT IP and Google Royce Williams (May 22)