nanog mailing list archives
Re: bgp convergence problem
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 10:41:21 -0400
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote:
On Wednesday, May 07, 2014 07:28:46 PM Peter Rubenstein wrote:Operationally speaking, AS1 should not be leaking routes from one upstream to the other. Bad route policy.
ideally it'd be nice to be valley-free... so to speak.
Also, AS3 should not accept routes from AS1 that don't belong to it. Customer router filtering would prevent this.
always with the route filtering... routes want to be free man, free!
How I wish this happened in real life. We are chasing route leaks several AS's down the path that are not even remotely connected to us on a weekly basis. But I guess that's what they pay us for :-(.
if only there were some technology that could be used to thwart such things.
Current thread:
- bgp convergence problem Song Li (May 05)
- Re: bgp convergence problem ISP Services (May 06)
- Re: bgp convergence problem Song Li (May 06)
- Re: bgp convergence problem ISP Services (May 06)
- Re: bgp convergence problem Song Li (May 06)
- Re: bgp convergence problem Valdis . Kletnieks (May 06)
- Re: bgp convergence problem Randy Bush (May 06)
- RE: bgp convergence problem Peter Rubenstein (May 07)
- Re: bgp convergence problem Mark Tinka (May 07)
- Re: bgp convergence problem Christopher Morrow (May 08)
- Re: bgp convergence problem Mark Tinka (May 08)
- Re: bgp convergence problem Christopher Morrow (May 08)
- Re: bgp convergence problem Mark Tinka (May 08)
- Re: bgp convergence problem Mark Tinka (May 07)
- Re: bgp convergence problem ISP Services (May 06)