nanog mailing list archives
Re: US patent 5473599
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 12:15:10 +0100
On 08/05/2014 12:09, Henning Brauer wrote:
my switches seem to deal with that, wether they have special handling for that mac addr range or not i dunno.
I've seen this problem cause downtime on production networks. fyi, it will probably work fine on hubs, but not on switches.
again, stress the fact that afair we have gotten zero reports about that "issue" for 10 years, it obviously means that either 1) a vast majority of switches deal with it just fine 2) people know that vhids shouldn't clash and avoid that
https://www.google.com/search?q=vrrp+carp+incompatible Several of the results refer to openbsd mailing list postings. Nick
Current thread:
- Re: US patent 5473599, (continued)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Owen DeLong (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Constantine A. Murenin (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Valdis . Kletnieks (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Constantine A. Murenin (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Blake Dunlap (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Laszlo Hanyecz (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Henning Brauer (May 08)
- Message not available
- Re: US patent 5473599 Henning Brauer (May 08)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Nick Hilliard (May 08)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Henning Brauer (May 08)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Nick Hilliard (May 08)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Geraint Jones (May 08)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Alain Hebert (May 08)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Henning Brauer (May 06)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Owen DeLong (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 TGLASSEY (May 07)
- RE: US patent 5473599 Leo Vegoda (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 David Conrad (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Matt Palmer (May 07)
- Re: US patent 5473599 Rob Seastrom (May 07)
- Please moderate yourselves, was: Re: US patent 5473599 joel jaeggli (May 07)