Re: ARIN board accountability to network operators (was: RE: [arin-ppml] [arin-discuss] Term Limit Proposal)

[John Curran <jcurran () arin net>]

> On Mar 28, 2014, at 5:27 AM, "Randy Bush" <randy () psg com> wrote:
>
> john,
>
> i think your attemt to move the discussion to the arin ppml list
> exemplifies one core of the problem.

Randy -

I offered ppml out of respect to the nanog subscribers, that is all...

/John




> and this is aside from daniel's global measurement empire.  not sure it
> is a registry's job to do this, but it is a serious contribution to the
> internet.
>
> the ncc is engaged with its community on the subhects that actually
> interest operators and affect our daily lives.
>
> there is nothing of interest at an arin meeting, a bunch of junior
> wannabe regulators and vigilantes making an embarrassing mess.  i've
> even taken to skipping nanog, if ras talks i can watch the recording.
> all the cool kids will be in warsaw.  ops vote with our feet.
>
> ran