nanog mailing list archives
Re: arin representation
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 19:13:54 -0700
On Mar 23, 2014, at 9:59 PM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
But perhaps Randy is looking for the number of /24 equivalents allocated to legacy resource holders who haven't also received an IPv6 direct allocation or other IPv4 direct allocation under an RSA?what percentage of address space is held by members and what percentage by non-members (lrsa-only is part of the latter)? what percentage of holding organizations are members and what percentage not members (lrsa-only being part of the latter)?
If you intend for RSA assignment holders to also be semi-randomly split between the two categories, then, yes. If not, then, your exact words do not say exactly what you intend. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: arin representation, (continued)
- Re: arin representation Randy Bush (Mar 24)
- Re: arin representation Paul Andersen (Mar 25)
- Re: arin representation Randy Bush (Mar 25)
- Re: arin representation Barry Shein (Mar 25)
- Re: arin representation Paul Andersen (Mar 25)
- Re: arin representation Paul Andersen (Mar 25)
- Re: arin representation John Curran (Mar 25)
- Re: arin representation Randy Bush (Mar 25)
- Re: arin representation John Curran (Mar 25)
- Re: arin representation Randy Bush (Mar 25)
- Re: arin representation Owen DeLong (Mar 24)
- Re: arin representation Owen DeLong (Mar 24)
- RE: arin representation Naslund, Steve (Mar 24)
- Re: arin representation Jared Mauch (Mar 28)