nanog mailing list archives
Re: misunderstanding scale
From: Timothy Morizot <tmorizot () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 13:50:49 -0500
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:37 PM, William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:
What sort of traction are you getting from that argument when you speak with enterprise security folks?
Actually, I never even had to make the argument in our enterprise. Our cybersecurity organization already knew that overall NAT reduced rather than enhanced network security and had a deeper real understanding of security defense in depth than I did. I never had to convince anyone that NAT wasn't a security feature. It sounds like we have so many enterprises that do security poorly because many don't even understand the basics. Scott
Current thread:
- Re: misunderstanding scale, (continued)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Karl Auer (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Mark Tinka (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale William Herrin (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Michael Thomas (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale William Herrin (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Joe Greco (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale William Herrin (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Lee Howard (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale William Herrin (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Lee Howard (Mar 25)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Timothy Morizot (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Timothy Morizot (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Joe Greco (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Michael Thomas (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Joe Greco (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale William Herrin (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Joe Greco (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Michael Thomas (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale William Herrin (Mar 24)
- RE: misunderstanding scale Eric Wieling (Mar 24)