nanog mailing list archives
Re: misunderstanding scale
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:02:11 +0000
On 24/03/2014 06:47, Mark Tinka wrote:
Because, at the very least, a laptop or server can run a stateless packet filter to keep out pokes at ports that may be running by default, but have no business being queried over the network.
once upon a time, they didn't have host firewalls or packet filters, which was why we ended up with: https://isc.sans.edu/diary/Survival+Time+on+the+Internet/4721 Nick
Current thread:
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.), (continued)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) Mark Andrews (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) Mark Tinka (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) Nick Hilliard (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) Mark Andrews (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Nick Hilliard (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale bmanning (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Mark Andrews (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Matt Palmer (Mar 23)
- RE: misunderstanding scale Ray (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Mark Tinka (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Nick Hilliard (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Mark Tinka (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) Mark Tinka (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) Owen DeLong (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Michael Thomas (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) Laszlo Hanyecz (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) Mark Tinka (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) Owen DeLong (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) Matt Palmer (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) Owen DeLong (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) John R. Levine (Mar 24)