nanog mailing list archives
Re: misunderstanding scale
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 02:31:38 -0400
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 16:21:50 -0700, Paul Ferguson said:
On the other hand, there are beaucoup enterprise networks unwilling to consider to moving to v6 until there are management, control, administrative, and security issues addressed.
The problem is that for many of those enterprises, the actual understanding of those issues even in the v4 arena is tenuous at best. You know - the same sort of beancounters and auditors with checklists that insist on NAT and won't allow a stateful firewall, or worry about ND attacks but don't check if you have anything in place to defeat ARP flooding....
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: misunderstanding scale, (continued)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Owen DeLong (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Owen DeLong (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale George Herbert (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Owen DeLong (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Mark Andrews (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Jimmy Hess (Mar 25)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Owen DeLong (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Mark Tinka (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Mark Andrews (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Owen DeLong (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Owen DeLong (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Bryan Socha (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Tim Franklin (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) Bob Evans (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) TJ (Mar 25)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) Lee Howard (Mar 25)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) Bob Evans (Mar 25)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) Owen DeLong (Mar 25)