nanog mailing list archives
Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.)
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 20:35:48 +0200
On (2014-03-23 20:09 +0200), Mark Tinka wrote:
I expect this to change little in the enterprise space. I think use of ULA and NAT66 will be one of the things enterprises will push for, because how can a printer have a public IPv6 address that is reachable directly from the Internet, despite the fact that there is a properly configured firewall at the perimetre offering half-decent protection?
Or IT isn't buying the 'renumbering is easy' argument, for any non-trivial size company even figuring how where exactly can be IP addresses punched out statically would be expensive and long process. If you are pushing for customer to use your PA in their LAN, I'm guessing net-result is you should never reclaim those addresses after customer leaves, since chances are, some customers won't renumber, but will 1:1 NAT your PA to new operator PA, and your next customer with this block will complain about reachability problems to this other customer. But at least we can hope it'll be 1:1 NAT + ULA, which I would suggest to my enterprise customers who won't want to get PI or become LIR. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: misunderstanding scale, (continued)
- Re: misunderstanding scale John Levine (Mar 26)
- RE: misunderstanding scale Naslund, Steve (Mar 26)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Owen DeLong (Mar 26)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Matthias Leisi (Mar 27)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Chip Marshall (Mar 27)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Barry Shein (Mar 27)
- Re: misunderstanding scale, SMTP edition John Levine (Mar 26)
- Re: misunderstanding scale, SMTP edition Jack Bates (Mar 26)
- Re: misunderstanding scale, SMTP edition Lamar Owen (Mar 26)
- Re: misunderstanding scale, SMTP edition Tony Finch (Mar 26)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) Saku Ytti (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) Mark Tinka (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) Mark Andrews (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) Mark Tinka (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) Nick Hilliard (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) Mark Andrews (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Nick Hilliard (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale bmanning (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Mark Andrews (Mar 23)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Matt Palmer (Mar 23)
- RE: misunderstanding scale Ray (Mar 23)