nanog mailing list archives
Re: misunderstanding scale
From: Tore Anderson <tore () fud no>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 19:50:33 +0100
* Nick Hilliard
the level of pain associated with continued deployment of ipv4-only services is still nowhere near the point that ipv6 can be considered a viable alternative.
This depends on who you're asking; as a blanket statement it's demonstrably false: For the likes of T-Mobile USA¹ and Facebook², or even myself³, IPv6-only isn't just an «alternative». It's «happening». [1] http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/TMobile-Goes-IPv6-Only-on-Android-44-Devices-126506 [2] https://www.dropbox.com/s/doazzo5ygu3idna/WorldIPv6Congress-IPv6_LH%20v2.pdf [3] http://www.ipspace.net/IPv6-Only_Data_Centers Tore
Current thread:
- misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) TJ (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) Bryan Socha (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Robert Webb (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Doug Barton (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Nick Hilliard (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale George William Herbert (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Tore Anderson (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Nick Hilliard (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Justin M. Streiner (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Nick Hilliard (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Justin M. Streiner (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Michael Hallgren (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Randy Bush (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale William Herrin (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Tore Anderson (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Randy Bush (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale William Herrin (Mar 24)
- Re: misunderstanding scale Robert Webb (Mar 22)
- Re: misunderstanding scale (was: Ipv4 end, its fake.) Bryan Socha (Mar 22)