Re: How to catch a cracker in the US?

[James R Cutler <james.cutler () consultant com>]

On Mar 13, 2014, at 11:08 AM, William Herrin <bill () herrin us> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:13 AM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 13:22:40 -0000, "Sholes, Joshua" said:
> >
> > > If one came up in this field with a mentor who was old school, or if one
> > > is old school oneself, one tends use the original (as I understand it)
> > > definitions--a "cracker" breaks security or obtains data unlawfully, a
> > > "hacker" is someone who likes ethically playing (in the "joyful
> > > exploration" sense) with complicated systems.
> >
> > For the old-schoolers, a "cracker" would violate the CFAA to get into a system.
> >
> > A hacker would produce a long list of ways to get in without violating the CFAA.
> >
> > Unfortunately, we no longer have a well-established word for the latter
> > class of people.
>
>
> You're all talkin' 1990s redefinitions here. 1980s crackers cracked
> the copy protections on software (DRM in modern parlance) while
> hackers broke in to online systems. Even that is a redefinition.
> Before that, hackers were anyone who jovially pranked a system in a
> manner typically unlawful which involved creativity and technical
> challenge.
>
> For example, "hackers" might arrange for live cattle to appear on the
> top of the great dome at MIT.
>
> Regards,
> Bill Herrin

And Bill documents yet another redefinition.  Prior to that time, at MIT a “hacker” produced a novel variation of 
technology using it in ways not previously envisioned but not necessarily unlawful.  

Mating two different generations of telephone keysets or reducing a complex rack mount filter to a single small circuit 
board with an FET or two are just a couple of examples.  One was just a “hack”, the other an “elegant hack”.  We just 
called the moving of the rocket a “prank”. 

        Cutler

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail