nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco Security Advisory
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 07:43:43 +0200
On Saturday, March 29, 2014 02:34:13 AM Scott Weeks wrote:
You got 5 (actually 6 this time) perhaps because you're only on NANOG. I got over 30 this time and once when there were 9 vulnerabilities I got almost 50 emails from cisco.
I've always known that Cisco will submit their notices to multiple lists, including their own. So when I see it on one list, I already know to expect it on others. Given how easy they are to "identify", I immediately delete them from other lists which I've decided is not the primary list I want to learn them on. It does help that they stack them up in one batch, so you don't even need to think about it much. But clearly, this is one of those issues where you have a good amount of folk on either side of the fence. Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco Security Advisory Scott Weeks (Mar 28)
- Re: Cisco Security Advisory Robert Drake (Mar 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Cisco Security Advisory Scott Weeks (Mar 28)
- Re: Cisco Security Advisory Mark Tinka (Mar 28)
- Re: Cisco Security Advisory Randy Bush (Mar 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Cisco Security Advisory Larry Sheldon (Mar 28)
- Re: Cisco Security Advisory Mark Tinka (Mar 28)