nanog mailing list archives

Re: richard () bennett com has shared Cable companies astroturfing support against FCC Title II regulation | Electronista


From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 20:36:56 -0400

Richard:

While you & I don't have the best relationship ever, I would not - and did not - do anything of the sort. I'm a little 
more, let's say, blunt about my displeasures. You don't have to believe me, but those are the facts.

Also, just to be clear again, I have zero problem with pointing out the impersonation, I was questioning the 
"speculators" part. I.e. You implied you would not send that, and I wondered why you wouldn't. But since you think it 
is off-topic (and I did not), that's a perfectly valid reason not to send such posts. Thank you for clearing it up.

-- 
TTFN,
patrick

On Jun 06, 2014, at 20:24 , Richard Bennett <richard () bennett com> wrote:

I wanted the NANOG community to know that someone is impersonating me. I don't send off-topic links from dodgy blogs 
to email lists.

I now have a pretty good idea as to who the impersonator is; it seems that Gilmore has too much time on his hands.

RB

On 6/6/14, 5:06 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
I believe I listed 3.

And there are multiple times I have posted similar items in the past.

Just curious about the "speculators" thing. But I think we're off-topic, so apologies to the audience for extra 
email in their inboxes. I've sent reply-to to my personal address to avoid this blowing up (although I don't know if 
mailman will respect that).


-- 
Richard Bennett
Visiting Fellow, American Enterprise Institute
Center for Internet, Communications, and Technology Policy
Editor, High Tech Forum



Current thread: